San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County clients covering How Do Claims Against The City Of San Diego Work

How Do Claims Against The City Of San Diego Work

Gloria was driving home from work when a San Diego Metropolitan Transit System bus ran a red light, slamming into the driver’s side of her vehicle. She suffered a fractured femur, a concussion, and significant nerve damage, resulting in over $121,852 in medical bills and lost wages—and that was just the beginning. The City’s claims process is notoriously complex, and without experienced legal counsel, victims often find themselves navigating a bureaucratic maze, ultimately receiving a fraction of the compensation they deserve.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

Claims against the City of San Diego, or any government entity, differ significantly from typical car accident lawsuits. Unlike suing a private individual or insurance company, you’re essentially suing the taxpayers, which means heightened scrutiny and a very specific procedural framework. The City’s risk management department is highly experienced in defending these types of claims and will aggressively look for reasons to deny or undervalue your case.

The first, and most critical, step is filing a formal Government Tort Claims Act (GTCA) claim. This isn’t a simple matter of sending a letter; it requires detailed documentation, specific legal arguments, and adherence to strict deadlines. Failure to comply with even seemingly minor requirements can result in the immediate dismissal of your claim. Don’t make the mistake of trying to handle this process alone.

I’ve practiced personal injury law in San Diego for over 13 years, and a significant portion of my practice involves representing clients injured by government vehicles or negligence. I’ve been trained by former insurance defense attorneys, which has given me intimate knowledge of how these claims are evaluated, devalued, and denied. This insight allows me to build stronger cases and navigate the complexities of the GTCA effectively.

What is the Government Tort Claims Act claim filing process with the City of San Diego?

San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County clients covering How Do Claims Against The City Of San Diego Work

The GTCA dictates a very specific timeline. In California law, you have only two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit for personal injury. However, before you can even think about filing a lawsuit against the City of San Diego, you MUST file a formal administrative claim within 6 months (180 days) under the Government Tort Claims Act. This claim must be submitted to the City’s risk management department and include a comprehensive account of the incident, your injuries, and the damages you’ve sustained.

The claim itself is a critical document. It’s not merely a request for compensation; it’s a legal pleading that sets the foundation for your case. The City will thoroughly investigate the claim, often relying on their own internal reports and witness statements. They are not obligated to accept your version of events, and will actively seek evidence to contradict your claims.

After submitting your claim, the City has 90 days to investigate and respond. They can either accept the claim, deny the claim, or request additional information. If the claim is denied, you then have six months to file a lawsuit. Failing to do so will permanently bar your claim.

What types of damages can I recover in a claim against the City of San Diego?

You may be entitled to recover various damages, including medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, property damage, and potentially other related losses. However, recovering the full extent of your damages often requires demonstrating a clear link between the City’s negligence and your injuries.

A significant challenge in these cases is proving the City’s negligence. Simply showing that an accident occurred isn’t enough. You must establish that the City or its employees acted carelessly or failed to fulfill a legal duty of care. This often involves obtaining police reports, witness statements, and potentially expert testimony.

Furthermore, be aware that the City will attempt to minimize the value of your claim by arguing comparative fault. They may claim you were partially responsible for the accident, reducing the amount of compensation you’re entitled to. This is where having a knowledgeable attorney is crucial, as we can proactively address these arguments and build a strong case on your behalf.

What if the City denies my claim? What are my options?

If the City denies your claim, you’re not without recourse. You have the right to file a lawsuit in Superior Court, but you must do so within six months of the denial. This is a strict deadline, and missing it will likely result in your claim being dismissed.

Filing a lawsuit is a complex legal process. It involves drafting a formal complaint, conducting discovery (gathering evidence), potentially taking depositions (sworn testimony), and ultimately presenting your case to a jury. The City will have legal representation, and it’s essential to have an experienced attorney on your side to navigate these challenges effectively.

It’s important to remember that the City will continue to defend their position aggressively throughout the litigation process. They may file motions to dismiss your case, challenge your evidence, and attempt to negotiate a low-ball settlement. A skilled attorney can anticipate these tactics and develop a strategic approach to protect your rights.

Does it matter if the accident involved a bus, a police vehicle, or another City employee?

While the GTCA applies regardless of the type of City vehicle or employee involved, the specific circumstances of the accident and the available evidence may vary. For instance, accidents involving buses often involve the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), which has its own internal procedures and insurance policies. Accidents involving police vehicles may raise questions about qualified immunity and police training.

Each type of incident requires a tailored approach to investigation and legal strategy. An experienced attorney will understand the unique challenges associated with each scenario and develop a comprehensive plan to maximize your chances of success. For example, claims involving police misconduct often require careful examination of body camera footage and internal police records.

Regardless of the vehicle involved, it’s crucial to document everything thoroughly, including the accident scene, witness statements, and your medical treatment. The City will rely on their own investigation, and it’s essential to have independent evidence to support your claims.

What should I avoid doing after an accident with a City of San Diego vehicle?

Several things you should avoid doing after an accident with a City of San Diego vehicle. First and foremost, do not admit fault, even if you believe you were partially responsible. Anything you say can be used against you later. Secondly, do not sign any documents or release any medical information without consulting with an attorney.

The City’s insurance adjuster may attempt to contact you shortly after the accident, offering a quick settlement. Be wary of these offers, as they are often significantly lower than the true value of your claim. It’s best to avoid communicating with the City or their representatives directly until you’ve spoken with an attorney.

Finally, preserve all evidence related to the accident, including photos of the damage, witness contact information, and your medical records. The more evidence you have, the stronger your case will be. Remember, the City has resources at their disposal, and it’s essential to protect your own interests.

California Statutory Authority & Case Law
Deadlines & Standing
CCP § 335.1

2-year statute of limitations for personal injury filings.

CCP § 377.60

Defines standing for wrongful death lawsuits.

Gov. Code § 911.2

6-month claim deadline against government entities.

CCP § 2017.010

Scope of discovery: controls relevant case evidence.

Negligence & Conduct
Civ. Code § 1714

Duty of care: general negligence foundation.

Civ. Code § 2338

Respondeat superior: employer liability rules.

Veh. Code § 17150

Statutory liability for motor vehicle owners.

Veh. Code § 21703

Tailgating: primary rule for rear-end collisions.

Evid. Code § 669

Negligence per se: violations of safety statutes.

Valuation & Insurance
Howell v. Hamilton Meats

Limits medical damages to amounts actually paid or owed.

Ins. Code § 11580.2

Statutory framework for UM/UIM claims.

Civ. Code § 1431.2

Several liability: allocation of non-economic damages.


Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable State Bar of California advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Viewing or reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures governing personal injury claims vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. You should consult a qualified California personal injury attorney regarding your specific situation before taking any legal action.
Local Office:
Morse Injury Law
2831 Camino del Rio S #109
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 684-3092
Responsible Attorney: Richard Morse, California Attorney (Bar No. 289241).
Morse Injury Law is a practice name and location used by Richard Peter Morse III, a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was prepared by the legal editorial team supporting Richard Peter Morse III, with the goal of explaining California personal injury law and claims procedures in clear, accurate, and practical terms for injured individuals in San Diego and surrounding communities.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Richard Morse, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 289241), who concentrates his practice on personal injury litigation and insurance claim disputes.
With more than 13 years of experience representing injury victims throughout California, Mr. Morse focuses on serious personal injury matters including motor vehicle collisions, uninsured and underinsured motorist claims, premises liability, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. His practice emphasizes claims evaluation, insurance carrier accountability, and litigation in California courts when fair resolution cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts