Morse Injury Law helping San Diego victims covering Should I Sign Medical Authorization Forms For Insurance

Should I Sign Medical Authorization Forms For Insurance

Last week, I spoke with Dale, a construction worker injured in a multi-car pile-up on the I-5 freeway. Kent was understandably eager to settle his claim quickly, and the insurance adjuster immediately requested he sign a broad medical authorization form. Dale, wanting to cooperate, nearly signed it without question. However, a quick call to my office saved him a potential nightmare – the form allowed the insurance company access to his entire medical history, not just records relating to the crash. This well-intentioned act of cooperation could have resulted in them discovering pre-existing conditions and devaluing his claim by over $125,000.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

The short answer is: proceed with extreme caution. Insurance companies routinely request these authorizations early in the claim process, ostensibly to verify the nature and extent of your injuries. However, the scope of these forms is often overly broad, giving them access to information far beyond what’s relevant to your accident. They’re not looking out for your best interests; they’re evaluating risk and searching for ways to minimize their payout.

As a personal injury attorney with over 13 years of experience practicing in San Diego, I’ve seen firsthand how insurance adjusters leverage these forms to unfairly reduce settlements. I was trained by former insurance defense attorneys, and I understand their tactics intimately. They’re adept at cherry-picking pre-existing conditions or unrelated medical issues to cast doubt on the legitimacy of your claim, even if those conditions had no bearing on the accident.

What information should I actually authorize the insurance company to access?

Morse Injury Law helping San Diego victims covering Should I Sign Medical Authorization Forms For Insurance

You are not obligated to sign anything you’re not comfortable with. If presented with a broad medical release, insist on narrowing its scope. Specifically, limit the authorization to records pertaining solely to the injuries sustained in the accident and the treatment received for those injuries. Include a specific date range, starting from the date of the accident and ending when your treatment concludes. Demand that the release specify the medical providers whose records they’re seeking.

Specifically, you want to authorize release of records from: the hospital emergency room, the doctors who treated you for injuries related to the crash, physical therapists, chiropractors, and any specialists involved in your care. Do not include records from your primary care physician unless they specifically treated you for injuries caused by the accident. Furthermore, you can request a copy of the executed authorization form for your records.

Be wary of authorizations that request access to your entire medical history, mental health records, or employment history. These requests are often fishing expeditions and provide the insurer with ammunition to devalue your claim. Remember, they are skilled at interpreting medical records in their favor, even if the information is ambiguous.

What if the insurance company refuses to proceed without a broad authorization?

This is a common tactic. They may claim they cannot adequately evaluate your claim without a complete medical history. Do not be intimidated. You can politely but firmly reiterate your position and refuse to sign an overly broad release. You are entitled to a fair assessment based on the injuries you sustained in the accident, and a broad authorization is not a prerequisite for that assessment.

In many cases, simply asserting your rights and narrowing the scope of the authorization is enough to resolve the issue. However, if the insurer remains insistent, consult with a personal injury attorney. We can negotiate on your behalf, ensuring your privacy is protected and your claim is evaluated fairly. A San Diego attorney experienced in dealing with these insurers knows what to look for and can protect your rights.

Can I revoke an authorization form after I’ve signed it?

Yes, you generally have the right to revoke a medical authorization form at any time, in writing. However, it’s important to understand that information already obtained by the insurance company before the revocation is likely still usable. This is why it’s crucial to be cautious from the outset and carefully review the scope of any authorization before signing it. If you’ve already signed a broad release and are concerned about the information the insurer may have obtained, consult with an attorney immediately.

What should I do if I’ve already signed a broad medical authorization form?

Don’t panic, but take action immediately. Contact a personal injury attorney to review the form and assess the potential risks. We can advise you on the best course of action, which may include sending a revocation letter to the insurance company and requesting a copy of all medical records they’ve obtained. It’s also important to gather documentation supporting your claim and proactively address any pre-existing conditions that may be highlighted by the insurer.

What are the potential consequences of signing a broad authorization form?

The most common consequence is a reduced settlement offer. Insurance companies often use pre-existing conditions, unrelated medical issues, or even minor prior injuries to justify a lower payout. They may argue that your current injuries are not solely attributable to the accident or that your pain and suffering are exaggerated due to pre-existing conditions. This can significantly impact the value of your claim and leave you undercompensated for your injuries and losses.

  • Risk of Discovery of Unrelated Issues: An overly broad authorization exposes issues that are irrelevant to your current claim.
  • Reduced Settlement Value: Insurance companies use pre-existing conditions to devalue your claim.
  • Prolonged Negotiation: Disputing the relevance of unrelated medical information can delay the settlement process.

California Statutory Authority & Case Law
Deadlines & Standing
CCP § 335.1

2-year statute of limitations for personal injury filings.

CCP § 377.60

Defines standing for wrongful death lawsuits.

Gov. Code § 911.2

6-month claim deadline against government entities.

CCP § 2017.010

Scope of discovery: controls relevant case evidence.

Negligence & Conduct
Civ. Code § 1714

Duty of care: general negligence foundation.

Civ. Code § 2338

Respondeat superior: employer liability rules.

Veh. Code § 17150

Statutory liability for motor vehicle owners.

Veh. Code § 21703

Tailgating: primary rule for rear-end collisions.

Evid. Code § 669

Negligence per se: violations of safety statutes.

Valuation & Insurance
Howell v. Hamilton Meats

Limits medical damages to amounts actually paid or owed.

Ins. Code § 11580.2

Statutory framework for UM/UIM claims.

Civ. Code § 1431.2

Several liability: allocation of non-economic damages.


Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable State Bar of California advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Viewing or reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures governing personal injury claims vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. You should consult a qualified California personal injury attorney regarding your specific situation before taking any legal action.
Local Office:
Morse Injury Law
2831 Camino del Rio S #109
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 684-3092
Responsible Attorney: Richard Morse, California Attorney (Bar No. 289241).
Morse Injury Law is a practice name and location used by Richard Peter Morse III, a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was prepared by the legal editorial team supporting Richard Peter Morse III, with the goal of explaining California personal injury law and claims procedures in clear, accurate, and practical terms for injured individuals in San Diego and surrounding communities.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Richard Morse, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 289241), who concentrates his practice on personal injury litigation and insurance claim disputes.
With more than 13 years of experience representing injury victims throughout California, Mr. Morse focuses on serious personal injury matters including motor vehicle collisions, uninsured and underinsured motorist claims, premises liability, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. His practice emphasizes claims evaluation, insurance carrier accountability, and litigation in California courts when fair resolution cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts