San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County clients while explaining When Should A Structured Settlement Be Considered

When Should A Structured Settlement Be Considered

Last Tuesday, I met with Nelson, a 62-year-old retired carpenter, who was broadsided by a driver running a red light. Nelson suffered a fractured femur, a traumatic brain injury, and permanent nerve damage to his shoulder. His initial medical bills topped $128,721, and he faces a lifetime of ongoing care. He’s understandably overwhelmed, not just by the physical pain, but by the financial uncertainty. His question wasn’t whether he could sue—it was, “How will I manage all this when I can no longer work?”

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

That question brings us to structured settlements, a powerful, often overlooked tool in personal injury cases. They aren’t right for everyone, but for those with significant, long-term needs, they can provide a financial lifeline that a lump-sum payout simply can’t match. A structured settlement replaces a portion – or even all – of a settlement award with a series of guaranteed payments over a defined period, sometimes for life.

Think of it as creating your own private pension funded by the at-fault party’s insurance. Instead of receiving a single check, you receive regular, tax-free income tailored to your specific needs. This can cover medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation costs, and even future care requirements. The insurance company purchases an annuity, and the payments are made directly to you, or to healthcare providers on your behalf.

For over thirteen years, I’ve practiced personal injury law here in San Diego, and I’ve witnessed firsthand the peace of mind a structured settlement can offer. Having previously worked for insurance defense firms, I understand intimately how they evaluate claims and, more importantly, how they often attempt to minimize payouts. They rarely lead with structured settlement options, focusing instead on quicker, lower-value lump-sum offers. That’s why having experienced counsel is critical.

What are the key benefits of choosing a structured settlement?

San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County clients while explaining When Should A Structured Settlement Be Considered

The most significant advantage is financial security. Unlike a lump sum, which can be quickly depleted through unwise spending or unforeseen circumstances, a structured settlement provides a steady stream of income, insulated from market volatility. This is especially beneficial for individuals with long-term medical conditions or those who lack the financial expertise to manage a large windfall. Payments are also often tax-free, maximizing the value of your recovery. They can also be designed to address very specific future financial needs such as college tuition, home modifications, or even end-of-life care.

Furthermore, structured settlements can protect you from potential creditors or lawsuits that might arise in the future. The payments are generally shielded from such claims, ensuring that the funds remain available for your intended purpose. This is because the settlement funds are transferred to a qualified assignment company and become part of a trust designed for your benefit. It’s a powerful safeguard against unforeseen financial risks.

However, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. A structured settlement sacrifices immediate access to the full settlement amount. If you have pressing, short-term financial needs, a lump sum might be more appropriate. It’s also important to understand the terms of the annuity contract and the associated fees. Careful evaluation and expert guidance are essential.

How does the process of structuring a settlement actually work?

Once a settlement has been reached with the insurance company, we’ll work with a qualified structured settlement broker to design a payment plan that meets your specific needs. The broker will obtain quotes from various annuity providers, ensuring competitive rates and favorable terms. We’ll then present you with different options, outlining the payment amounts, frequency, and duration. This involves a detailed analysis of your current and future expenses, as well as your long-term financial goals.

Once you approve a plan, the settlement funds are transferred to the annuity provider. The provider then makes regular payments to you, or directly to your healthcare providers, according to the agreed-upon schedule. The entire process is overseen by a court, ensuring the validity and enforceability of the settlement. In San Diego, these settlements require judicial approval to confirm it’s in your best interest, and the court will independently review the details.

It’s critical to work with an attorney experienced in structured settlements to ensure you receive a fair and comprehensive plan. An experienced lawyer can negotiate the terms of the annuity contract, identify potential pitfalls, and protect your rights throughout the process. They can also help you evaluate whether a structured settlement is the right choice for your unique circumstances.

What factors should I consider before agreeing to a structured settlement?

Several key factors come into play when deciding whether a structured settlement is right for you. Your age, health, and anticipated future medical expenses are all crucial considerations. If you have significant ongoing care needs, a structured settlement can provide the long-term financial security you require. Your financial stability and ability to manage a lump sum are also important. If you have a history of poor financial decisions, a structured settlement can prevent you from depleting your funds prematurely.

Finally, consider your lifestyle and personal preferences. If you value flexibility and immediate access to funds, a lump sum might be more appealing. However, if you prioritize security and peace of mind, a structured settlement can be a valuable asset. It’s essential to weigh the pros and cons carefully and seek professional advice before making a decision. Remember, you aren’t required to accept the insurance company’s first offer, and there’s always room for negotiation.

Before entering into any agreement, thoroughly research the annuity provider and ensure they have a strong financial rating. You don’t want to entrust your future financial security to an unstable company. The State of California provides resources for reviewing structured settlement options and brokers. An attorney can help you navigate this process and ensure you’re making an informed choice.

Can I modify a structured settlement after it’s been approved?

Modifying a structured settlement after it’s been approved is generally difficult, but not impossible. The terms of the annuity contract are typically fixed, and changing them requires the consent of the insurance company and court approval. However, there are certain circumstances in which modifications may be permitted, such as a significant change in your financial circumstances or a medical emergency. This is where the expertise of an experienced attorney can be invaluable.

For instance, if you experience unexpected expenses or a change in your healthcare needs, we can petition the court to allow a modification of the payment schedule. The court will carefully review your situation and determine whether the modification is reasonable and justified. The insurance company may also be willing to negotiate a change in terms, particularly if you can demonstrate a compelling need. However, be prepared for a potentially lengthy and complex legal process.

It’s important to note that any modification to a structured settlement may have tax implications. We’ll work with a qualified tax advisor to ensure you understand the potential consequences and minimize any adverse effects. Ultimately, the best approach is to carefully consider all your options before agreeing to a settlement, and to work with an attorney who can guide you through the process and protect your rights.

What are some potential drawbacks of structured settlements?

While structured settlements offer many benefits, they are not without their drawbacks. The most significant disadvantage is the lack of immediate access to the full settlement amount. If you have pressing financial needs, a lump sum might be more appropriate. You also sacrifice control over your funds, as the insurance company manages the annuity. This can be a concern for some individuals who prefer to have direct control over their finances. The interest earned on the annuity is generally not taxable, but the principal amount may be subject to certain limitations.

Furthermore, you may encounter difficulties if you need to access funds for unexpected expenses or emergencies. While some annuity contracts allow for limited withdrawals, these often come with penalties or fees. It’s crucial to carefully review the terms of the contract before agreeing to a settlement. Finally, the insurance company may not offer the most favorable annuity rates, so it’s important to shop around and compare options. An attorney can help you navigate these potential pitfalls and ensure you receive a fair and comprehensive plan.

I’ve seen cases where clients later regretted structuring too much of their settlement. It’s a permanent decision, and making the right choice requires careful consideration and expert advice. That’s why a thorough financial assessment and comprehensive legal guidance are essential. Don’t be afraid to ask questions, and always prioritize your long-term financial security.

California Statutory Authority & Case Law
Deadlines & Standing
CCP § 335.1

2-year statute of limitations for personal injury filings.

CCP § 377.60

Defines standing for wrongful death lawsuits.

Gov. Code § 911.2

6-month claim deadline against government entities.

CCP § 2017.010

Scope of discovery: controls relevant case evidence.

Negligence & Conduct
Civ. Code § 1714

Duty of care: general negligence foundation.

Civ. Code § 2338

Respondeat superior: employer liability rules.

Veh. Code § 17150

Statutory liability for motor vehicle owners.

Veh. Code § 21703

Tailgating: primary rule for rear-end collisions.

Evid. Code § 669

Negligence per se: violations of safety statutes.

Valuation & Insurance
Howell v. Hamilton Meats

Limits medical damages to amounts actually paid or owed.

Ins. Code § 11580.2

Statutory framework for UM/UIM claims.

Civ. Code § 1431.2

Several liability: allocation of non-economic damages.


Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable State Bar of California advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Viewing or reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures governing personal injury claims vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. You should consult a qualified California personal injury attorney regarding your specific situation before taking any legal action.
Local Office:
Morse Injury Law
2831 Camino del Rio S #109
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 684-3092
Responsible Attorney: Richard Morse, California Attorney (Bar No. 289241).
Morse Injury Law is a practice name and location used by Richard Peter Morse III, a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was prepared by the legal editorial team supporting Richard Peter Morse III, with the goal of explaining California personal injury law and claims procedures in clear, accurate, and practical terms for injured individuals in San Diego and surrounding communities.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Richard Morse, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 289241), who concentrates his practice on personal injury litigation and insurance claim disputes.
With more than 13 years of experience representing injury victims throughout California, Mr. Morse focuses on serious personal injury matters including motor vehicle collisions, uninsured and underinsured motorist claims, premises liability, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. His practice emphasizes claims evaluation, insurance carrier accountability, and litigation in California courts when fair resolution cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts