What Is An Excess Judgment After A Car Accident

Name

Email*

Phone*

Message*

Get My Free Case Review

Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

An excess judgment arises when the damages you’ve suffered in a car accident – encompassing medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and property damage – surpass the available insurance coverage of the at-fault party. Simply put, their policy limits are insufficient to fully compensate you for all your losses. It’s a frustrating situation, as obtaining a favorable verdict in court doesn’t automatically guarantee full recovery if the responsible party lacks the assets to pay.

California law provides a two-year window from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit for personal injury. If the claim is against a government entity (like a San Diego City vehicle), you MUST file a formal administrative claim within 6 months (180 days) under the Government Tort Claims Act.

What steps can I take to recover an excess judgment?

Pursuing an excess judgment requires a multifaceted approach beyond simply winning a lawsuit. The first step is thoroughly investigating the at-fault party’s assets. This includes examining their income, property ownership (real estate, vehicles, bank accounts), and any other potential sources of wealth. We often utilize skilled investigators to uncover hidden assets that may not be immediately apparent.

Once assets are identified, we can employ various legal strategies to collect the judgment. These methods may include wage garnishment (deducting a portion of their income), bank levies (seizing funds from their accounts), and placing liens on their property. However, it’s important to understand that certain assets are legally protected from seizure, such as Social Security benefits and certain retirement accounts.

A crucial, often overlooked aspect is determining if the at-fault party has any applicable insurance policies beyond their standard auto coverage. Homeowners insurance or umbrella policies may provide additional coverage that can be tapped into, significantly increasing the potential for recovery. We routinely explore all possible insurance avenues on behalf of our clients.

I’ve been practicing personal injury law in San Diego for over 13 years, and one of the most valuable lessons I learned early in my career was gained while working with a former insurance defense attorney. This experience provided me with intimate knowledge of how insurance companies evaluate, devalue, and deny claims, and, critically, how they assess risk and potential asset availability. It’s knowledge that directly benefits my clients when facing an excess judgment situation.

Can I pursue the at-fault driver’s employer if the accident occurred during their work hours?

In many instances, yes. If the at-fault driver was acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the accident, their employer may be vicariously liable for their negligence under the doctrine of “respondeat superior.” This means you can pursue a claim against the employer’s insurance policy, which typically has higher limits than an individual auto policy.

However, establishing employer liability requires demonstrating that the driver was, in fact, engaged in work-related activities when the accident occurred. This can involve reviewing their employment contract, work schedule, and any communications related to their duties at the time of the incident. It also requires understanding whether they were on a delivery, making a sales call, or otherwise furthering the employer’s business interests.

Furthermore, the employer may have separate insurance coverage specifically designed to protect against accidents caused by their employees. Identifying and pursuing claims against these policies is a critical step in maximizing your recovery potential, particularly when dealing with an excess judgment.

What if the at-fault driver declares bankruptcy?

A bankruptcy filing can complicate matters significantly, but it doesn’t necessarily preclude you from recovering your excess judgment. The type of bankruptcy the driver files (Chapter 7 or Chapter 13) will determine the process and potential outcome. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, most unsecured debts, including judgments, are discharged (eliminated). However, certain debts, such as those arising from intentional or reckless conduct, may not be dischargeable.

If the driver files Chapter 13, they may propose a repayment plan to pay off their debts over a period of several years. You may be able to participate in the bankruptcy proceedings and advocate for your claim to be prioritized in the repayment plan. We work closely with bankruptcy attorneys to ensure our clients’ rights are protected throughout this process.

It’s crucial to file a “proof of claim” with the bankruptcy court within the specified deadline, otherwise, your claim may be forfeited. Understanding the nuances of bankruptcy law is essential when pursuing an excess judgment against a driver facing financial hardship.

How does comparative fault impact an excess judgment?

California follows a ‘pure’ comparative fault system. A plaintiff can recover damages even if they are 99% at fault, but their total recovery will be reduced by their percentage of responsibility. In San Diego cases, insurance adjusters aggressively use this to devalue claims.

If the insurance adjuster argues you bear some portion of the blame for the accident – even if it’s a minor percentage – it can significantly reduce the amount of your recoverable damages. For example, if you are awarded a $100,000 judgment but are found 10% at fault, your recovery would be reduced to $90,000. This can quickly turn a potential excess judgment into a situation where the insurance policy is sufficient to cover your losses.

We meticulously investigate the accident to challenge any allegations of comparative fault. This includes gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and presenting a strong defense against any claims that you contributed to the incident. Protecting your degree of fault is a critical step in maximizing your recovery and successfully pursuing an excess judgment.

What are “bad faith” damages and how might they help?

If the insurance company acted unfairly or unreasonably in handling your claim, such as failing to conduct a proper investigation or delaying payment without justification, you may be entitled to “bad faith” damages beyond the original policy limits. These damages can include additional compensation for emotional distress, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages.

To establish bad faith, we must demonstrate that the insurance company violated its duty of good faith and fair dealing, as outlined in California law. This requires a thorough review of their claims handling process and evidence of unreasonable conduct. If successful, a bad faith claim can significantly increase your recovery potential, particularly when dealing with an excess judgment scenario.

In cases involving oppression, fraud, or malice, a San Diego jury may award punitive damages to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct. This is commonly pursued in DUI accidents or cases of corporate gross negligence.