San Diego Injury Attorney representing San Diego victims while discussing What Is Negligent Hiring In Accident Litigation

What Is Negligent Hiring In Accident Litigation

Just last week, I spoke with Nashalie, a schoolteacher broadsided by a delivery van while she was commuting to work. The impact shattered her femur, and she’s already facing over $123,819 in medical bills—not to mention lost wages and the constant pain. But the initial police report only indicated the driver ran a stop sign. What Nashalie, and many accident victims, don’t realize is there may be more than just the driver at fault; the employer could be liable through a legal theory called negligent hiring.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

Negligent hiring occurs when an employer knows, or should have known, that an employee posed an unreasonable risk of harm to others and they hired that person anyway. This isn’t simply about a bad driver having an accident. It’s about the employer’s due diligence—or lack thereof—in vetting their employees before putting them behind the wheel. Did they check driving records? Did they conduct thorough background checks? Did they ignore red flags that should have disqualified the applicant?

To successfully pursue a negligent hiring claim, we have to prove a direct link between the employer’s failure to properly investigate and the accident. For instance, if the driver had multiple prior DUIs, and the employer failed to uncover this during a background check, that’s strong evidence of negligence. The same applies if the driver had a history of reckless driving or a commercial driving license suspension. These are the types of things a responsible employer would uncover before entrusting someone with a company vehicle.

I’ve been practicing personal injury law in San Diego for over 13 years, and I’ve seen firsthand how insurance companies attempt to shield employers from liability. They will argue the driver was independently negligent and that the company had no way of knowing about their prior bad acts. That’s where having an attorney familiar with the nuances of these claims becomes critical—particularly because I was trained by former insurance defense attorneys, giving me intimate knowledge of how insurance companies evaluate, devalue, and deny claims.

What Evidence Do I Need to Prove Negligent Hiring?

San Diego Injury Attorney representing San Diego victims while discussing What Is Negligent Hiring In Accident Litigation

Gathering the right evidence is crucial in a negligent hiring case. Simply claiming the employer should have known isn’t enough. We need concrete proof of their failure to exercise reasonable care.

This can include the driver’s employment application, driving record, any internal company policies regarding employee background checks, and evidence that the employer was aware of prior incidents involving the driver. Subpoenaing records from the employer is often necessary. We also explore whether the company had a pattern of hiring unqualified drivers, which could demonstrate a systemic negligence.

Additionally, documentation of the accident itself – police reports, witness statements, medical records, and photos of the damage – will all play a key role in establishing the extent of your injuries and the driver’s negligence, which are essential elements linking back to the employer’s liability.

Can I Sue Both the Driver and the Employer in a Negligent Hiring Case?

Absolutely. In many cases, you can and should pursue claims against both the driver and the employer. These are separate legal theories of recovery. The driver is liable for their own negligence in causing the accident, while the employer is liable for their negligence in hiring an unfit employee.

Importantly, the insurance coverage may differ between the driver’s personal policy and the employer’s commercial policy. Pursuing both claims maximizes your potential for recovery. It’s also worth noting that the employer’s policy limits are often significantly higher than an individual driver’s policy, giving you access to potentially greater compensation.

Recovering from an accident can be a difficult journey, but understanding your legal options is the first step towards securing the justice you deserve. Don’t allow an insurance company to dictate the outcome of your case—let an experienced attorney investigate all potential avenues of recovery, including negligent hiring.

What if the Employer Claims They Performed a Background Check?

Even if the employer claims they conducted a background check, we still need to scrutinize its thoroughness. Was it a comprehensive check, or simply a cursory glance? Did they verify the driver’s entire driving history, or just the past few years? Were there any discrepancies or red flags that were overlooked?

In San Diego, there are specific requirements for employment background checks, particularly for drivers. We’ll investigate whether the employer complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Often, the employer’s internal processes will be inadequate, creating grounds for a negligent hiring claim even if they technically performed some sort of check.

We will also consider the quality of the background check service used. Some services are more reliable and comprehensive than others. If the employer used a substandard service, that could be evidence of negligence.

How Does Comparative Fault Affect a Negligent Hiring Claim?

California follows a ‘pure’ comparative fault system, meaning your recovery can be reduced even if you were partially at fault for the accident. Civ. Code § 1714 states that your damages will be proportionally reduced based on your percentage of responsibility. However, this doesn’t automatically disqualify you from recovering compensation.

In a negligent hiring case, the insurance company will likely argue you contributed to the accident through some form of negligence—speeding, distracted driving, or failure to yield, for example. It’s crucial to anticipate these arguments and gather evidence to demonstrate your reasonable care. We will examine all the facts to accurately assess your percentage of fault and protect your right to maximum compensation.

Remember, even if you bear some responsibility, you may still be entitled to substantial damages from both the driver and the employer. A skilled attorney can navigate the complexities of comparative fault and fight for the recovery you deserve.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Filing a Negligent Hiring Claim?

In California, you generally have two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit. This includes negligent hiring claims. Civil Code § 3333.4 sets the strict deadline for these cases. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your claim, so it’s crucial to act quickly.

However, determining the precise statute of limitations can be complex, particularly if there are multiple parties involved or if the accident occurred outside of California. It’s always best to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to ensure you don’t miss any crucial deadlines.

Don’t wait until the last minute to pursue your claim. Gathering evidence, investigating the employer’s hiring practices, and negotiating with insurance companies takes time. Protect your rights by contacting an experienced attorney today.

California Statutory Authority & Case Law
Deadlines & Standing
CCP § 335.1

2-year statute of limitations for personal injury filings.

CCP § 377.60

Defines standing for wrongful death lawsuits.

Gov. Code § 911.2

6-month claim deadline against government entities.

CCP § 2017.010

Scope of discovery: controls relevant case evidence.

Negligence & Conduct
Civ. Code § 1714

Duty of care: general negligence foundation.

Civ. Code § 2338

Respondeat superior: employer liability rules.

Veh. Code § 17150

Statutory liability for motor vehicle owners.

Veh. Code § 21703

Tailgating: primary rule for rear-end collisions.

Evid. Code § 669

Negligence per se: violations of safety statutes.

Valuation & Insurance
Howell v. Hamilton Meats

Limits medical damages to amounts actually paid or owed.

Ins. Code § 11580.2

Statutory framework for UM/UIM claims.

Civ. Code § 1431.2

Several liability: allocation of non-economic damages.


Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable State Bar of California advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Viewing or reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures governing personal injury claims vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. You should consult a qualified California personal injury attorney regarding your specific situation before taking any legal action.
Local Office:
Morse Injury Law
2831 Camino del Rio S #109
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 684-3092
Responsible Attorney: Richard Morse, California Attorney (Bar No. 289241).
Morse Injury Law is a practice name and location used by Richard Peter Morse III, a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was prepared by the legal editorial team supporting Richard Peter Morse III, with the goal of explaining California personal injury law and claims procedures in clear, accurate, and practical terms for injured individuals in San Diego and surrounding communities.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Richard Morse, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 289241), who concentrates his practice on personal injury litigation and insurance claim disputes.
With more than 13 years of experience representing injury victims throughout California, Mr. Morse focuses on serious personal injury matters including motor vehicle collisions, uninsured and underinsured motorist claims, premises liability, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. His practice emphasizes claims evaluation, insurance carrier accountability, and litigation in California courts when fair resolution cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts