San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County victims while discussing What Assets Can Be Pursued After A Policy Limits Settlement

What Assets Can Be Pursued After A Policy Limits Settlement

Denise was driving home from work when a distracted driver blew a red light and T-boned his car. The impact shattered his femur, requiring multiple surgeries and months of intensive physical therapy. His medical bills quickly exceeded $112,843, and he faced a long road to recovery, unable to return to his previous job. After a hard-fought battle with the insurance company, we secured a policy limits settlement of $100,000. Unfortunately, that barely covered his medical expenses, let alone his lost wages and pain and suffering.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

It’s a common misconception that once an insurance company pays its policy limits, the case is over. That’s simply not true, especially when those limits don’t fully compensate you for your injuries and losses. Many avenues remain open to pursue further recovery, even after a settlement is reached. What those avenues are depends heavily on the specifics of your case, including the at-fault driver’s assets and the existence of other potential sources of recovery.

The key is understanding that the insurance settlement only addresses the at-fault driver’s liability up to the limits of their policy. It does not release them from all responsibility for your damages. In fact, the driver remains personally liable for any amount exceeding those limits. This is where asset investigation becomes crucial. As a personal injury attorney in San Diego with over 13 years of experience, I’ve seen firsthand how insurance companies minimize payouts, leaving my clients with significant outstanding debts. Trained by a former insurance defense attorney, I intimately know how they evaluate, devalue, and deny claims.

What Types of Assets Can Be Pursued?

San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego County victims while discussing What Assets Can Be Pursued After A Policy Limits Settlement

Identifying potential assets is the first step. These can range significantly depending on the individual’s financial situation. Real estate, such as homes, land, and investment properties, are often prime targets. Bank accounts, investment portfolios (stocks, bonds, mutual funds), and retirement accounts (401(k), IRA) are also frequently recoverable. Beyond these, we can explore other holdings such as vehicles, boats, or valuable personal property like jewelry, artwork, or collectibles. A thorough asset search can reveal hidden wealth that the at-fault driver may not have initially disclosed.

It’s important to note that some assets are protected from creditors under California law – for example, certain retirement funds and homestead exemptions. However, those protections are not absolute and are subject to various limitations. We’ll perform a comprehensive analysis to determine which assets are legitimately available for recovery.

Furthermore, if the at-fault driver owns a business, we can investigate the business’s assets as well. This could include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and even the business itself. Successfully pursuing these business assets requires a different legal strategy, often involving business litigation techniques.

What if the At-Fault Driver Declares Bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy is a real concern, and it can complicate the recovery process. If the driver files for bankruptcy, it triggers an automatic stay, effectively halting any collection efforts. However, bankruptcy doesn’t automatically erase the debt. The debt may be dischargeable, depending on the type of bankruptcy filed and the specific circumstances. We can object to the dischargeability of the debt, arguing that it resulted from the driver’s negligence and potentially represents fraudulent activity.

Even in bankruptcy, certain assets may be exempt from liquidation. Moreover, a claim may be considered a priority debt, giving it a higher likelihood of recovery. Navigating the complexities of bankruptcy requires specialized legal knowledge, and we’ll work closely with bankruptcy attorneys to maximize your chances of recovery.

Understanding the process of asset investigation is a crucial step after a policy limits settlement. It is not always easy or straightforward and often requires the expertise of a seasoned personal injury attorney. In San Diego, we’ve successfully recovered significant sums for our clients by strategically pursuing available assets, even in the face of challenging circumstances.

Can I Pursue a Claim Against the At-Fault Driver’s Employer?

In some cases, the at-fault driver was acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the accident. This opens the door to pursuing a claim against their employer under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Employers are legally responsible for the negligent acts of their employees when those acts occur during the course and scope of employment.

Establishing employer liability can be complex, requiring proof that the driver was performing work-related duties at the time of the collision. This may involve reviewing employment records, interviewing witnesses, and analyzing the driver’s job description. If we can successfully establish employer liability, we can pursue a claim against the employer’s insurance policy, which often carries much higher limits than the driver’s personal policy.

What if the At-Fault Driver Had Other Insurance Policies?

Many individuals carry multiple insurance policies, such as homeowners insurance or umbrella policies, in addition to their auto insurance. These policies may provide additional coverage for accidents, even if the auto policy limits have been exhausted. Identifying these supplemental policies requires a thorough investigation, including reviewing the driver’s financial records and conducting diligent searches.

Umbrella policies, in particular, can provide significant coverage – often $1 million or more – and can be a valuable source of recovery in cases involving serious injuries. However, accessing these policies often requires navigating complex coverage disputes and proving that the accident falls within the policy’s terms.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Pursuing Assets After a Settlement?

Even after securing a settlement, time is of the essence. California’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of the accident. However, if you’re pursuing a claim against the at-fault driver personally after a settlement, the statute of limitations may be different and could be impacted by when the settlement was reached. It is crucial to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to ensure you don’t miss the deadline to file a lawsuit. CIV Code 335.1 outlines these regulations.

Waiting too long can result in the loss of your legal rights, so it’s essential to act promptly. We can immediately begin investigating assets and preserving your claim, protecting your ability to recover the full compensation you deserve.

What if the At-Fault Driver is Underinsured?

While this question focuses on assets after a settlement, it’s important to clarify that the initial settlement amount matters. If the at-fault driver was underinsured, meaning their policy limits were insufficient to cover your damages, pursuing assets becomes even more critical. Conversely, if the driver was adequately insured, the need for asset investigation may be less pressing.

Determining the extent of insurance coverage and the driver’s personal assets is always the first step. We’ll work diligently to explore all possible sources of recovery, ensuring you receive the maximum compensation available under the law.

California Statutory Authority & Case Law
Deadlines & Standing
CCP § 335.1

2-year statute of limitations for personal injury filings.

CCP § 377.60

Defines standing for wrongful death lawsuits.

Gov. Code § 911.2

6-month claim deadline against government entities.

CCP § 2017.010

Scope of discovery: controls relevant case evidence.

Negligence & Conduct
Civ. Code § 1714

Duty of care: general negligence foundation.

Civ. Code § 2338

Respondeat superior: employer liability rules.

Veh. Code § 17150

Statutory liability for motor vehicle owners.

Veh. Code § 21703

Tailgating: primary rule for rear-end collisions.

Evid. Code § 669

Negligence per se: violations of safety statutes.

Valuation & Insurance
Howell v. Hamilton Meats

Limits medical damages to amounts actually paid or owed.

Ins. Code § 11580.2

Statutory framework for UM/UIM claims.

Civ. Code § 1431.2

Several liability: allocation of non-economic damages.


Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable State Bar of California advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Viewing or reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures governing personal injury claims vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. You should consult a qualified California personal injury attorney regarding your specific situation before taking any legal action.
Local Office:
Morse Injury Law
2831 Camino del Rio S #109
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 684-3092
Responsible Attorney: Richard Morse, California Attorney (Bar No. 289241).
Morse Injury Law is a practice name and location used by Richard Peter Morse III, a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was prepared by the legal editorial team supporting Richard Peter Morse III, with the goal of explaining California personal injury law and claims procedures in clear, accurate, and practical terms for injured individuals in San Diego and surrounding communities.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Richard Morse, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 289241), who concentrates his practice on personal injury litigation and insurance claim disputes.
With more than 13 years of experience representing injury victims throughout California, Mr. Morse focuses on serious personal injury matters including motor vehicle collisions, uninsured and underinsured motorist claims, premises liability, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. His practice emphasizes claims evaluation, insurance carrier accountability, and litigation in California courts when fair resolution cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts