San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego victims while explaining: Can Insurance Deny Claims Due To Policy Exclusions?

Can Insurance Deny Claims Due To Policy Exclusions?

Elizabeth was enjoying a weekend ride through the mountains east of San Diego when a distracted driver crossed the center line, colliding head-on with his motorcycle. The impact shattered his femur, fractured his ribs, and left him with severe road rash. His medical bills quickly surpassed $128,741, but his insurance company denied his claim, citing a clause in his policy regarding ‘risky riding behavior.’ Elizabeth was devastated, unsure how to fight back against a powerful corporation and protect his financial future.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

Policy exclusions are the insurance company’s way of limiting their financial responsibility. They are specific conditions or activities that, if present, allow the insurer to deny coverage, even if you’ve been paying your premiums. Common exclusions in motorcycle policies include racing, stunt riding, operating the motorcycle under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or using it for commercial purposes without proper endorsement. However, simply *having* an exclusion in the policy doesn’t automatically mean a claim will be denied. The insurance company has the burden of proving that the exclusion applies to your specific situation.

The language in insurance policies is notoriously complex, and often written to be ambiguous. Insurers frequently exploit this ambiguity to deny legitimate claims. They may argue that a particular activity falls under a broad exclusion, even if it’s a stretch. For example, they might claim that riding aggressively constitutes ‘risky behavior,’ even if you weren’t intentionally engaging in reckless conduct. This is where having an experienced attorney on your side is crucial. We can dissect the policy language, identify weaknesses in their arguments, and build a strong case to challenge the denial.

I’ve been practicing personal injury law in San Diego for over 13 years, and I’ve seen firsthand how insurance companies operate. I was trained by a former insurance defense attorney, giving me intimate knowledge of how they evaluate, devalue, and deny claims. They rely on tactics like misinterpreting policy language, downplaying the severity of injuries, and attempting to shift blame onto the rider. My goal is to level the playing field and ensure that you receive the full compensation you deserve.

Can I challenge an insurance denial based on a policy exclusion?

San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego victims while explaining: Can Insurance Deny Claims Due To Policy Exclusions?

Absolutely. Challenging a denial is often the first step. The insurance company must provide a clear and documented reason for the denial, specifically pointing to the relevant policy exclusion and explaining how it applies to your case. You can request a detailed explanation of their decision, and if you disagree with their interpretation, you have the right to appeal. We can help you gather evidence to refute their claims, such as witness statements, police reports, and expert testimony.

Often, the denial stems from a mischaracterization of the facts. For example, if they claim you were racing, we can present evidence showing you were simply riding at a safe speed within the legal limits. It’s important to remember that the insurance company must prove their case, not you. They need to demonstrate a clear connection between the exclusion and the accident.

What if the insurance company claims I violated the terms of my policy?

If the insurer alleges a policy violation, it’s essential to examine the evidence carefully. They must provide concrete proof of the violation, such as dashcam footage, police reports, or witness testimony. Simply asserting a violation isn’t enough. We can investigate the circumstances surrounding the accident, interview witnesses, and gather evidence to challenge their claims. If the evidence is weak or inconclusive, we can argue that the denial is unjustified.

Furthermore, the insurance company has a duty of good faith and fair dealing. They cannot intentionally misinterpret the policy language or fabricate evidence to deny your claim. If we can demonstrate that they acted in bad faith, you may be entitled to additional damages, including punitive damages.

How does California law impact policy exclusions in motorcycle claims?

California law provides some protections for motorcyclists facing policy exclusions. For example, the law requires insurance companies to clearly disclose all policy terms and conditions. If the exclusion was not prominently displayed or explained to you when you purchased the policy, it may be unenforceable. Additionally, California’s comparative fault system applies to motorcycle claims. Even if you shared some responsibility for the accident, you can still recover damages, although your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. Civ. Code § 1714

It’s also important to note that California is a universal helmet law state, requiring all riders and passengers to wear a safety helmet that meets DOT standards. CVC § 27803 While a helmet violation may be used by defense counsel to argue for a reduction in damages via comparative fault, it does not bar a rider from seeking recovery for other injuries caused by a negligent driver.

What evidence should I gather if my claim is denied due to a policy exclusion?

Gathering evidence is crucial to challenging a denial. This includes the police report, witness statements, photos of the accident scene, medical records, and any documentation related to your motorcycle policy. If there were any dashcam recordings or surveillance footage, obtain those as well. It’s also helpful to document any communication you’ve had with the insurance company, including emails, letters, and phone calls.

Additionally, consider obtaining a copy of your motorcycle’s maintenance records to demonstrate that it was properly maintained and not a contributing factor to the accident. If you were involved in a lane-splitting accident, gather evidence showing that you were operating your motorcycle in a safe and prudent manner. CVC § 21658.1

What is the statute of limitations for filing a motorcycle accident claim in California?

In California, you generally have **two years** from the date of the motorcycle accident to file a lawsuit for personal injury. CCP § 335.1 Because evidence at a crash scene—such as skid marks or GoPro footage—can disappear quickly, immediate filing is critical to preserve the integrity of the claim. Don’t delay seeking legal counsel, as missing the statute of limitations deadline can result in the permanent loss of your right to recover.

Authority Reference Grid: San Diego Motorcycle Accidents
CCP § 335.1
2-year injury filing deadline.
Gov § 911.2
6-month public entity claim limit.
Civ § 1714
Pure comparative negligence.
Civ § 3294
Punitive damages authority.
CVC § 21801
Left-turn right-of-way rule.
CVC § 22107
Unsafe lane change violations.
CVC § 22350
Basic speed law.
CVC § 23152
DUI causing injury.
CVC § 20001
Injury hit-and-run.
CVC § 21658.1
Lane splitting legality.
CVC § 27803
Mandatory helmet law.
Gov § 835
Dangerous public property liability.
Ins § 11580.2
UM/UIM coverage rights.
Ins § 790.03
Unfair claim practices.
CCP § 377.60
Wrongful death standing.
CACI 1200
Strict product liability standard.

Similar Posts