San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego commercial trucking victims while explaining: Can Towing Companies Be Sued After Accidents?

Can Towing Companies Be Sued After Accidents?

The flashing lights of a tow truck were the last thing Leo saw clearly before impact. He’d been rear-ended while waiting to assist a stranded motorist on the I-5, and the resulting collision left him with a fractured pelvis and over $128,791 in medical bills. But the real shock came when he learned the tow truck company’s insurance company was denying his claim, claiming they weren’t liable for the accident caused by the driver they’d hired.

Confidential Confidential Case Review • No Fee Unless We Win

Attorney Richard Morse a San Diego Injury Attorney

This scenario, unfortunately, is far more common than people realize. While towing companies provide a vital service, they are not immune from liability when their negligence causes an accident. Determining fault in these cases can be complex, involving questions of direct negligence, vicarious liability, and proper procedures. As a personal injury attorney practicing in San Diego for over 13 years, I’ve seen firsthand how insurance companies attempt to minimize their exposure in these situations. I was trained by former insurance defense attorneys, giving me intimate knowledge of how they evaluate, devalue, and deny claims.

The first step in evaluating a potential claim against a towing company is understanding the different ways they can be held responsible. Direct negligence could involve a driver’s careless operation of the tow truck – speeding, distracted driving, or failing to properly secure a vehicle. However, liability often extends beyond the driver themselves. A towing company can also be held liable for negligent hiring, training, or supervision of its employees. If the company knew, or should have known, about a driver’s unsafe practices or a history of violations, they may be directly responsible for the resulting damages.

Can I Sue a Towing Company if Their Driver Caused an Accident?

San Diego Injury Attorney helping San Diego commercial trucking victims while explaining: Can Towing Companies Be Sued After Accidents?

Yes, you can pursue legal action against a towing company if their driver’s negligence led to your injuries. Establishing negligence requires proving that the towing company or its driver owed you a duty of care, breached that duty, and that breach directly caused your damages. This often involves gathering evidence such as police reports, witness statements, and the driver’s employment records. In San Diego, we frequently utilize dashcam footage and vehicle maintenance logs to build a strong case.

Furthermore, it’s crucial to determine if the driver was an employee or an independent contractor. The level of control the towing company exercised over the driver’s work is a key factor. If the driver was an employee, the company is more likely to be held vicariously liable for their actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Civ. Code § 2338 outlines the principles of vicarious liability in California.

What Types of Damages Can I Recover in a Lawsuit Against a Towing Company?

If you’ve been injured in an accident caused by a towing company’s negligence, you may be entitled to recover a range of damages, including medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, you may also be able to recover punitive damages if the towing company’s conduct was particularly egregious. It’s important to document all your expenses and keep detailed records of your treatment and recovery.

Calculating the full extent of your damages can be challenging, especially when dealing with long-term injuries or ongoing medical care. That’s why it’s essential to consult with an experienced attorney who can accurately assess your losses and fight for the maximum compensation you deserve. We understand the complexities of these cases and will work tirelessly to protect your rights.

What if the Towing Company Claims the Accident Wasn’t Their Fault?

Towing companies, like any business, will often attempt to minimize their liability. They may argue that the accident was caused by your own negligence, or that the driver was not acting within the scope of their employment. They might also claim that the accident was unavoidable. It’s crucial to be prepared to counter these arguments with strong evidence and a clear understanding of the law.

We frequently encounter situations where towing companies attempt to shift blame onto the injured party. However, we have a proven track record of successfully challenging these claims and holding negligent towing companies accountable for their actions. We will thoroughly investigate the accident, gather all relevant evidence, and build a compelling case on your behalf.

How Long Do I Have to File a Lawsuit Against a Towing Company?

In California, you generally have **two years** from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit. CCP § 335.1 sets forth the statute of limitations for personal injury claims. However, it’s important to note that there may be exceptions to this rule, such as cases involving government entities or minors. Because trucking companies often begin evidence destruction (like purging ELD data) as soon as the law allows, immediate filing is critical to preserve the integrity of the claim.

Waiting too long to file a lawsuit can result in the loss of your right to recover compensation. That’s why it’s crucial to consult with an attorney as soon as possible after an accident to understand your legal options and ensure that your claim is filed within the applicable time frame.

What Should I Do if a Towing Company is Trying to Record My Statement?

Insurance companies, including those representing towing companies, often request recorded statements from accident victims. While you are not legally obligated to provide a statement, doing so can be detrimental to your claim. Insurance adjusters are trained to ask leading questions and elicit information that can be used to devalue or deny your claim.

It’s best to politely decline the request for a recorded statement and consult with an attorney before speaking to any insurance representative. We can advise you on how to respond to their inquiries and protect your rights. We will handle all communication with the insurance company on your behalf, ensuring that your interests are fully protected.

What if I Have Medical Liens After an Accident with a Towing Company?

Medical liens arise when healthcare providers provide treatment to injured parties and seek reimbursement for their services. These liens can complicate the settlement process, as they must be resolved before you receive your full compensation. It’s important to understand your rights and options regarding medical liens, and to work with an attorney who can negotiate with healthcare providers to reduce the amount owed.

We have extensive experience dealing with medical liens and will work tirelessly to ensure that your liens are resolved fairly and efficiently. We will review your medical bills, negotiate with healthcare providers, and explore all available options to minimize your out-of-pocket expenses. We will ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possible, even with outstanding medical liens.

What if the Accident Involved a Government Vehicle or Road Hazard?

If the accident involved a government-owned vehicle or a dangerous road condition maintained by a public entity, a formal administrative claim **MUST** be presented within **6 months** (180 days). Gov. Code § 911.2 outlines the strict requirements of the Government Tort Claims Act. Failure to meet this deadline can result in the permanent loss of your right to recover.

The process of filing a government claim can be complex and time-sensitive. It’s crucial to consult with an attorney who is familiar with the Government Tort Claims Act and can ensure that your claim is properly filed and documented. We will handle all aspects of the claim process on your behalf, maximizing your chances of a successful recovery.

What if the Towing Company Offers a Policy Limits Tender?

A policy limits tender occurs when the towing company’s insurance company offers to settle your claim for the maximum amount of their insurance policy. While this may seem like a generous offer, it’s important to carefully consider whether it adequately compensates you for your injuries and losses. It’s crucial to understand the full extent of your damages before accepting any settlement offer.

We will thoroughly evaluate the policy limits tender and advise you on whether it is fair and reasonable. If the offer is insufficient, we will negotiate with the insurance company to secure a higher settlement amount. We will fight tirelessly to protect your rights and ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.

How Does Comparative Fault Affect My Claim Against a Towing Company?

California’s ‘pure’ comparative fault system applies to trucking claims. Civ. Code § 1714 dictates that even if you shared responsibility for the accident, you can still recover damages. However, your total compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

The insurance company may attempt to argue that you were partially responsible for the accident, in order to reduce their liability. It’s crucial to gather evidence that supports your version of events and counters their claims. We will thoroughly investigate the accident, gather witness statements, and build a compelling case on your behalf.

Authority Link Reference Table

Authority Link Reference Table
Statutory Authority Description
CCP § 335.1 Sets the 2-year limitations period for most California personal injury claims. In San Diego trucking cases, preserving evidence early is critical because carriers and insurers often move quickly to control records and narrative.
Gov. Code § 911.2 Requires timely presentation of claims against public entities (often 6 months). This matters when a crash involves roadway design, construction zones, transit agencies, or city/county responsibility.
CCP § 2017.010 Defines the scope of discovery. In trucking litigation, discovery targets driver logs/ELD data, qualification files, inspection/maintenance records, dispatch communications, and safety program documents.
CCP § 377.60 Identifies who has standing to bring a wrongful death claim. This is essential for fatal commercial vehicle crashes where multiple family members may have rights.
CCP § 377.30 Survival action authority. In fatal trucking cases, this can apply to claims the decedent could have brought (often tied to pre-death harms and litigation strategy alongside wrongful death).
Civ. Code § 1714 California’s general negligence framework. Trucking defendants often use comparative-fault narratives (lane position, following distance, speed, “cut-off” claims) to reduce claimed damages.
Evid. Code § 669 Negligence per se when a safety law is violated. This is frequently argued in trucking cases when FMCSA rules or CVC safety provisions are breached.
Civ. Code § 2338 Vicarious liability principles (respondeat superior). Critical when proving a motor carrier, delivery company, or fleet operator is responsible for a driver’s on-duty conduct.
CVC § 22406 Maximum speed limits for certain commercial vehicles and vehicles towing. Supports liability arguments and reconstruction when speed/conditions are disputed.
CVC § 34500 California’s commercial vehicle safety/inspection framework. Often relevant to maintenance failures, equipment defects, and inspection noncompliance.
Civ. Code § 3294 Punitive damages standard (oppression, fraud, or malice). Can matter in extreme trucking conduct cases (e.g., reckless safety policy violations, egregious impairment, or intentional evidence games).
Howell v. Hamilton Meats Damages valuation authority addressing medical specials (amounts actually paid/owed). Frequently impacts settlement math in catastrophic injury cases.
Li v. Yellow Cab Co. Foundational California comparative negligence authority. Trucking defendants often argue shared fault to reduce value; this anchors the comparative-fault framework used in negotiations and trial.
Civ. Code § 1431.2 Several liability allocation for non-economic damages. Important when multiple parties share responsibility (carrier, shipper/loader, broker, maintenance vendor, public entities).
Ins. Code § 11580.2 UM/UIM statutory framework. Relevant when a truck, delivery vehicle, or other responsible party is underinsured, unidentified, or coverage disputes arise.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSA)
49 CFR Part 395 Hours-of-service rules (fatigue). Directly tied to ELD/logbook questions, forced driving, rest break violations, and crash causation analysis.
49 CFR Part 396 Inspection, repair, and maintenance duties. Central for brake failures, tire failures, equipment defects, inspection records, and maintenance contractor liability.
49 CFR Part 391 Driver qualification rules (DQ files). Supports negligent hiring/retention claims and discovery of licensing, medical certification, training, and prior safety history.
49 CFR Part 382 Controlled substances and alcohol testing rules. Relevant to post-crash testing questions, DUI/impairment claims, and carrier compliance obligations.
49 CFR Part 392 Operational driving rules (safe driving, distracted driving policies, etc.). Used to frame duty, safety standards, and negligence arguments tied to driver conduct.
49 CFR Part 393 Parts and accessories necessary for safe operation. Supports defect/equipment theories involving brakes, lights, tires, underride guards, and other safety components.
49 CFR Part 383 Commercial driver’s license (CDL) standards. Relevant to CDL impact questions, qualification issues, endorsements, and compliance expectations for commercial drivers.

Similar Posts